Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Arnaboldi vs Daniel Cukierman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Arnaboldi vs Cukierman analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Arnaboldi vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Arnaboldi 0 - 0 Cukierman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Arnaboldi has won 45.02% of points on his second serve, while Cukierman has won 48.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Arnaboldi, in recent form, has won 54.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cukierman has won 58.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.54% and 36.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Arnaboldi has saved 58.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cukierman has saved 47.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Arnaboldi has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Cukierman winning 60.34% (W/L 35/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Arnaboldi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 24/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 6/ 18). Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 44/ 28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Arnaboldi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.78% of matches (W/L 26/ 19), where as Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Arnaboldi has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.14 while Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 234.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Arnaboldi has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cukierman has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Arnaboldi has converted 46.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cukierman has converted 45.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
570
Rank
428
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
413
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (165-130)
Career Total W/L
58% (246-179)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Arnaboldi | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 61% (14/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (36/25) | 61% (33/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (288/251) | 55% (268/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) | 67% (12/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.5 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 132 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:44 | 1:43:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.69 | 256.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (974/1825) | 63% (921/1472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (647/974) | 68% (627/921) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (384/851) | 48% (266/551) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (103/215) | 45% (87/192) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (774/1714) | 44% (719/1617) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (13/9) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 61% (14/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (12/6) | 20% (10/2) |
Federico Arnaboldi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Noah Perfetti
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Riccardo Di Vita
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Elmer Moller
42%
(
45 of
108)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
49%
(
31 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Campana
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
40%
(
22 of
55)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
37%
(
17 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
10
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
47%
(
63 of
133)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Richard Zusman
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Arnaboldi Vs Cukierman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
